contoh teks hortatory tentang kenakalan remaja lengkap dengan struktur

Pros and Cons of Curriculum 2013

Curriculum 2013 started to be implented on the school academic year 2013/2014. Although it has been officially used but the latest curriculum is still still raising the pros and cons among educational practitioners. Those who support it state that Curriculum 2013 is actually aiming to solidify the lessons so it does not burden the students. As a result, students will focus on the challenges of the future of the nation. So also with the teachers, they are not burdened in the preparation of the Education Unit Level Curriculum.
Further Curriculum 2013 itself is actually not something new. Curriculum 2013 is a combination of two kinds of earlier educational curriculum in Indonesia; CBSA (active student learning) and KTSP (education level curriculum). It is very advategeous as CBSA teaches students to be critical.

Conversely, those who do not agree with Curriculum 2013 state the new curriculum is less focus because it combines the learning subjects. In primary school it combines science subjects with Indonesian. According to them combining two subjects into one material may not be effective as it does not consider teacher’s competences in most of schools in different regions in Indonesia. Some parents also do not aggree with Curriculum 2013 as they still want that English is given to students from primary school. They argue that mastering foreign language need long time and prcess and it is good if statred from earlier. They added that many sources of common knowledges is written in foreign language, especially English.

The reason for the application of Curriculum 2013 also does not have a strong foundation. There is no in-depth study of the causes of the failure of previous curriculum which makes it to be replaced with the new one. Finally the pros and cons are always there. Curriculum 2013 has been already implemented. Will this new curriculum successfully lead education in Indonesia to move forward? We’re all going to see it.

Generic structure :

Paragraf 1 berisi Stating issue, yaitu:The implementation of Curriculum 2013Paragraf 2 dan 3 berisi Supporting arguments, yaitu pendapat yang menyetujui dengan diberlakukannya kuikulum baru. Hal ini sangt nampak pada kalimat:

–      Curriculum 2013 is aiming to solidify the lessons

–     Curriculum 2013 is a combination of two kinds of earlier educational curriculum in Indonesia.

Sementara paragraf 4, 5, dan 6 berisi Against Arguments, yaitu berisi beberapa pendapat yang tidak menyetujui adanya Kurikulum 2013. Kita lihat beberap kalimat berikut:The new curriculum is less focusThey still want that English is given to students from primary schoolApplication of Curriculum 2013 also does not have a strong foundation.Kemudian paragraf terakhir berisi Conclussion /Recommendation dari penulisnya, yaitu bisa dilihat pada kalimat berikutPros and cons are always there, dst